Methodology
How the entries in this edition are sourced, what the credibility marks mean, how translation works — and where all of it stops.
Last updated: August 2026
Sourcing
Every entry rests on a named source: a journal article, a preprint, an institution, a museum, a government body, a database or a book. We write our own text from it — we never reproduce someone else’s article. The source is listed on the entry with a link, so you can check the claim rather than take it from us. Entries frequently carry several sources; where one is the specific document behind a figure, it comes first.
Credibility marks
Each entry says how well supported it is, and the mark is shown rather than implied:
- Peer-reviewed — the claim rests on a peer-reviewed publication.
- Corroborated — independently confirmed by more than one source.
- Reported — reported by a credible source, not independently confirmed.
- Disputed — the evidence is contested, and we say by whom.
- Myth — widely repeated and not true. We keep these because the correction is the point.
Numbers
A statistic is stored with its unit, the period it covers, whether it is a measurement or an estimate, a confidence level and a methodology note. That is why a figure here is dated rather than live: a snapshot you can compare with the next measurement is more useful than a counter you cannot audit. Where a number is a model output, the entry says so instead of presenting it as a count.
Translation
Entries are written in Polish first and translated by a person, not published automatically. A section appears in English only once its content has been translated and approved, which is why the English edition can hold fewer entries in a section than the Polish one.
Some material is deliberately not shown here rather than shown in the wrong language. Where a field has no English version, the block is omitted — an English heading over a Polish paragraph would be worse than a shorter page. Image credits are the exception and always remain, because reusing a photograph without its credit would breach its licence.
Names keep their own spelling: Białowieża, Šumava, Dzūkija, Ötzi. Local legal and culinary terms stay in the original — allemansrätten, jokaisenoikeudet, smaženice — because that is what you would search for.
Limits
- These are editorial summaries, not systematic reviews. A source we did not find is a source we did not weigh.
- Rules on picking change. Country pages carry the date we checked them; treat anything older as a starting point, not an answer.
- Newly described species are reported as their describing authors state them; a 2026 description has not yet been tested by time.
- Species observation data, and the maps built from it, are Polish-only and documented in the Polish methodology.
Found an error, or a source we should have read? Tell us.